Current events and commentary on non-vaping issues, or the stuff where vaping is not the main theme.
They can suggest dangerous connection of third hand smoke and cancer, but they haven't proven a thing. Although there are more than enough people whose exposure to it is significantly bigger than in others.
What exactly is the objective here? Forbidding grandparents to see their grandchildren if one of them is a smoker because there are some nasty residues in their clothes that could harm the infant? Making everyone paranoid about going anywhere? Is there a competition going on in who's gonna be the stupidest on Google?
It's very easy to push your ineffective quit smoking products on people if you are Big, and especially if you are Pharma. Just shovel another million into another generic marketing campaign.
Not a day can go by without someone being offended by some 30 or 40 year old comedy. Remember Del Boy, Granpa and Rodney? Well, someone from the newer generations fondly nicknamed after feathery ice crystals was, guess what, offended by Only Fools and Horses.
Anti-smoking cohorts are actually anti-SMOKERS. Their quit or die mantra is useless to those they pretend they are concerned about. Their conclusions are either biased or not worth coming to.
Dear readers, I can see the future in which everybody is allowed to eat nothing but a bowl of prescribed soylent green. Or else. A bill is being prepared in Indiana (US) to allow companies to test their workers for tobacco. Meanwhile in Kent (UK), a school board decides to search kids' bags and confiscate all "unhealthy food".